CRAG
  • Myths
  • Helmet Law
  • Helmets
  • Propaganda
  • Media
  • Impact
  • Letters
  • Civil Rights
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Exemptions
  • FAQ
  • Links

Popular Posts

  • History of helmet law in Australia
  • The fallacy of the cracked helmet
  • Challenging a helmet fine through the courts
  • Trying to deny that helmets can aggravate brain injury
  • Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts
  • Exemptions
  • The myth that bicycle helmets protect against brain injury
  • How to escape bicycle helmet fines in Australia
  • 5 ways wearing a bicycle helmet can result in injuries
  • Are bicycle helmets dangerous?
  • Brief history of helmet law in Australia
  • Why did the injury rate triple after the helmet law?
  • The paradox of bicycle helmets
  • Review of Evidence of the Efficacy of Helmets for Cyclists
  • When the worst in the world try to lecture the rest
  • About Us
  • Helmet fanatics misleading tricks exposed at senate inquiry
  • Misguided doctors or marketing agents?
  • Has the helmet law improved safety?
  • Compulsory Helmets Debate in the ACT Legislative Assembly
  • My helmet saved my life!

    Abstract After the helmet law, many cyclists insisted that their helmets had saved them. Yet cycling injuries tripled. Why? Because helmets increase the risk of accidents.  What the data tells us Here are some stats on cycling death & serious injury for children in NSW, before and after the helmet law. Two years after the…

    May 5, 2012
  • Trying to deny that helmets can aggravate brain injury

    Abstract Several studies have reported that bicycle helmets can increase rotational acceleration. Rotational acceleration is the primary cause of brain injury. The Australian government commissioned a study to defend its controversial helmet law. The study set up unrealistic conditions fostering low rotational acceleration. The study claims that helmets do not increase brain injury. This is deceitful.…

    March 31, 2012
  • The emergence of policy-driven studies

    Abstract In the mid 1990’s, evidence emerged that the bicycle helmet law had failed to reduce the risk of cycling injuries. Governments responded by commissioning “studies” exaggerating the benefits of helmets while ignoring their tendency to increase accidents. Such policy-driven studies are quoted in official government communications to justify its controversial policy.   These deceitful…

    March 18, 2012
  • Research on helmet law in the UK

    In the UK, the helmet law has been debated for a long time, with the usual set of emotional arguments from helmet believers.  So far, rationality has prevailed, thanks to the efforts of the Cyclists Touring Club and independent researchers.  Here is some of the research that has help sanity prevail.   The Hillman report, one…

    February 26, 2012
  • Helmet believers doubtful after increase in injuries

    A helmet advocate researched Canadian provinces with a bicycle helmet law. What he found shocked him. Provinces with a helmet law experienced relatively more injuries. “A study that compared six-year periods on either side of the helmet laws in the four provinces that have them calculated a reduction in fatalities of 37 per cent and a reduction in…

    February 18, 2012
  • Do helmets really protect racing cyclists?

    Most sport cyclists wear a helmet as it is “obvious” it protects.  Does it? Since mandatory helmets, deaths of professional cyclists while racing have doubled: “The helmet rule for professional cyclists was brought by the UCI in 2003 following the death of Andrei Kivlev during the Paris-Nice race. Since then deaths of professional cyclists while racing have…

    January 26, 2012
  • Misguided study affected by confirmation bias

    Abstract Some studies attempt to “prove” that helmets reduce injuries rather than genuinely attempt to understand their actual protective effects. Bold claims are made. Yet the data does not support them. While such studies are well meaning, their misleading claims can push people towards counterproductive solutions.    One example is this study, that states it is designed to “demonstrate the…

    November 20, 2011
  • First Ad to repeal the helmet law

    An Australian cyclist has made the first ad to repeal the bicycle helmet law, after being inspired by the level of utility cycling among all ages in a trip in Italy.   The ad was even available in the mainstream media, not often that australian media shows an ad for free! The ad invites people to…

    November 12, 2011
  • Research on helmet law in Australia

    Bill Curnow: Bicycle helmets and public health in Australia The efficacy of bicycle helmets against brain injury Bicycle Helmets: A Scientific Evaluation The Cochrane Collaboration and bicycle helmets Bruce Robinson: Is There Any Reliable Evidence That Australian Helmet Legislation Works? Dorothy Robinson: Safety in numbers in Australia: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling…

    November 5, 2011
  • Bike helmet laws backfiring: doctor

    Here is an article from a doctor who has actually researched this topic and is able to look at the issue from a broader perspective, taking into account the damaging effects on health from discouraging cycling. “The best evidence is that [a helmet] doesn’t make any difference to serious head injury when riding a bicycle … initial…

    October 12, 2011
←Previous Page
1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 9
Next Page→
History of helmet law in AustraliaHistory of helmet law in Australia
The fallacy of the cracked helmetThe fallacy of the cracked helmet
Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts

CRAG

Proudly powered by WordPress

Loading Comments...