-
How to escape bicycle helmet fines in Australia
Nerendra Jeet Singh, a Sikh, went to court in New South Wales (NSW), Australia over a bicycle helmet fine. He escaped the fine, arguing that his identity and religion are of prime importance. In Queensland, Jasdeep Atwal challenged a helmet fine in court. The Sikh community has led Queensland to reform the helmet law to add a religious exemption.…
-
The fallacy of the cracked helmet
Abstract Intriguingly, a cracked bicycle helmet is often perceived as unequivocal proof of saving lives, but this is far from the truth. It is a sign of the helmet’s failure when the underlying styrofoam fails to compress. It’s a natural inclination to credit a helmet with saving us, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true.…
-
5 ways wearing a bicycle helmet can result in injuries
We tend to be less cautious Wearing a safety device creates a feeling of safety. This makes us less cautious. This well documented behavior is called risk compensation. We tend to take more risks when wearing safety equipment. Risk compensation is the tendency to take more risks when wearing safety equipment. The New York Times reported…
-
Why did the injury rate triple after the helmet law?
Abstract In a startling revelation, the injury rate has surged threefold in the wake of the helmet law’s implementation. Instead of enhancing safety, helmets have paradoxically intensified the danger associated with cycling by elevating the risk of accidents. Adorning a bicycle helmet certainly instills a sense of safety and protection. However, it’s essential to recognize…
-
The myth that bicycle helmets protect against brain injury
Abstract Brain injury is caused by rotational acceleration. Bicycle helmets are not designed to protect against it. In some circumstances they can increase it, aggravating brain injury. Wearing a helmet can make us feel safer. However feeling safe is different than being safe blank What surgeons say This article reports from a surgeon who operates on cyclists: ” “The…
-
History of helmet law in Australia
Abstract The introduction of compulsory bicycle helmets in Australia was driven by a belief held by doctors and pushed through by politicians without concrete evidence. While this move seemed well-intentioned, it ultimately disregarded potential side-effects and valuable research. Government findings even cautioned against soft-shell helmets due to the risk of brain injury, suggesting an upgrade…
-
The paradox of bicycle helmets
Abstract In a scenario where the very act of wearing “protection” ironically leads to a surge in injuries, it becomes imperative to dig deeper and unravel the underlying issues. Adorning a bicycle helmet certainly instills a sense of safety and protection. However, it’s essential to recognize that this perception of invincibility can inadvertently lead us…
-
Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts
Abstract In March 2013, Alan Todd, a steadfast advocate for Freestyle Cyclists, boldly took on the challenge of contesting a helmet fine in the Australian state of Victoria. His unwavering commitment to this cause led to a surprising outcome – he was granted a good behavior bond. The following account presents his firsthand perspective on…
-
Challenging a helmet fine through the courts
Abstract The defense of necessity provides a legal avenue for individuals to bypass certain laws when doing so is crucial to prevent even graver consequences. The evidence suggests that bicycle helmets, in some cases, heighten the risk of accidents and can lead to brain injuries. To avert such dire consequences, cyclists are empowered to make…
-
Are bicycle helmets dangerous?
Abstract blank Helmets protect against minor skull injuries like bruises and lacerations. Helmets: increase the risk of accidents increase the risk of neck injury increase the risk of brain injury Wearing a helmet can make us feel safer. However feeling safe is not the same as being safe Some politicians claim “Helmets save lives“. Is…
-
Has the helmet law improved safety?
Abstract After the helmet law, the risk of accidents doubled. The risk of death & serious injury for child cyclists increased by 50%. Wearing a helmet can make us feel safer. However feeling safe is different than being safe blank A noticeable impact of the helmet law has been to reduce cycling. Almost half stopped cycling,…
Popular Posts
- History of helmet law in Australia
- The fallacy of the cracked helmet
- Challenging a helmet fine through the courts
- Trying to deny that helmets can aggravate brain injury
- Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts
- Exemptions
- The myth that bicycle helmets protect against brain injury
- How to escape bicycle helmet fines in Australia
- 5 ways wearing a bicycle helmet can result in injuries
- Are bicycle helmets dangerous?
- Brief history of helmet law in Australia
- Why did the injury rate triple after the helmet law?
- The paradox of bicycle helmets
- Review of Evidence of the Efficacy of Helmets for Cyclists
- When the worst in the world try to lecture the rest
- About Us
- Helmet fanatics misleading tricks exposed at senate inquiry
- Misguided doctors or marketing agents?
- Has the helmet law improved safety?
- Compulsory Helmets Debate in the ACT Legislative Assembly