A recent increase in cycling injuries in Western Australia has resulted in the typical calls for “more helmets” as if it was the solution to cycling safety:
One-fifth of cyclists who have been treated over the past four years were not wearing a helmet.
In Western Australia, more than 30% of cyclists are not wearing helmets. If only 20% of injured cyclists are not wearing helmets, then cyclists without helmets are less at risk of injury that cyclists with helmets.
How are more helmets going to make cycling safer?
Many Australians have been led to believe that mandatory helmets makes cycling safer.
In Western Australia, There were 1,244 cyclists hospital admissions in 2011/2012 compared to 640 in 1985/1986, before the helmet law. This is despite 30% fewer cyclists who cycled daily.
The helmet law has:
- Reduced cycling
- Increased injuries
Since the helmet law, the rate of cycling hospitalisation has tripled.
A similar outcome was found in New South Wales, Australia.
Why call for more of the same failed policy?
Mandatory helmets have become the standard solution for cycling safety in Australia. Even though the policy hasn’t worked, many people can think of little else. Decades of helmet propaganda have made people switch to automatic responses.
This can be seen in this road safety strategy. Unimaginative bureaucrats can think of nothing better than this to improve cycling safety:
“Develop educational communications to target bicycle riders to increase the use of helmets”
When will we start asking better questions?
Why has the injury rate tripled since the helmet law?
Why are cycling serious injuries in Australia 22 TIMES higher than in the the Netherlands?
Why have cycling accidents increased since the helmet law?