Skip to content
CRAG
  • Myths
  • Helmet Law
  • Helmets
  • Propaganda
  • Media
  • Impact
  • Letters
  • Civil Rights
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Exemptions
  • FAQ
  • Links

Popular Posts

  • History of helmet law in Australia
  • The fallacy of the cracked helmet
  • Challenging a helmet fine through the courts
  • Trying to deny that helmets can aggravate brain injury
  • Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts
  • Exemptions
  • The myth that bicycle helmets protect against brain injury
  • How to escape bicycle helmet fines in Australia
  • 5 ways wearing a bicycle helmet can result in injuries
  • Are bicycle helmets dangerous?
  • Brief history of helmet law in Australia
  • Why did the injury rate triple after the helmet law?
  • The paradox of bicycle helmets
  • Review of Evidence of the Efficacy of Helmets for Cyclists
  • When the worst in the world try to lecture the rest
  • About Us
  • Helmet fanatics misleading tricks exposed at senate inquiry
  • Misguided doctors or marketing agents?
  • Has the helmet law improved safety?
  • Compulsory Helmets Debate in the ACT Legislative Assembly
  • COMPULSORY SELF-PROTECTION ON ROADS: GAIN OR HARM TO SOCIETY?

    Introduction A subject of current controversy in Australia is the role of governments in individuals’ choices about protecting themselves against disease and injury. Concerns have been expressed about infringement of civil liberties and possible adverse effects of preventive medical treatments that governments are urging, immunisation for example. People are rightly demanding the full scientific knowledge…

    December 26, 2010
  • Submission to the National Road Transport Commission

    Entrenchment of Helmet Laws in Australian Road Rules by Bill Curnow 18 August 1997 Under an agreement by all governments in Australia, the National Road Transport Commission is developing Australian Road Rules that all road users in Australia will need to follow. Draft rules were released for public comment in 1994. In the light of…

    December 26, 2010
  • The 3rd International Conference on Injury Prevention and Control

    The 3rd International Conference on Injury Prevention and Control [NOTE: The official Web site for this conference, which was formerly located at www.nisu.flinders.edu.au, is no longer available. Links from this page have been removed accordingly. ] The 3rd International Conference on Injury Prevention and Control was held in Melbourne, Australia from February 18-22 1996. For bicycle…

    December 26, 2010
  • Compulsory Bicycle Helmets: Unfair Discrimination

    Wearing of helmets has been compulsory for cyclists in Australia for years, but how many people know that reports of the Federal Office of Road Safety, in 1987 and 1998, recommend them for occupants of motor vehicles too? Hoping that helmet wearing would reduce serious head injury and satisfied that the costs and inconvenience to…

    December 26, 2010
  • Henderson Paper Reviewed

    The 1995 Henderson report can be found here.  It is another report exaggerating the benefits of helmets, funded by the NSW government. Another critique of this report can be found here. Individuals and organizations zealously pushing mandatory helmet use for cyclists are continuing to churn out reams of propaganda. One of the more voluminous efforts…

    December 26, 2010
  • Medical Doctors, and the Compulsory Helmets Law

    Introduction by Peter van Schaik Medical Doctors have frequently claimed the right to enforce compulsory helmets on cyclists, to protect the public purse. For example in his review entitled “The Effectiveness of Bicycle Helmets: A Review” (1995), Dr. Michael Henderson says: “There remains a proportion of the riding population who are opposed to legislation requiring…

    December 26, 2010
  • Civil Liberties Considerations

    A. AUSTRALIA 1. Lionel Murphy, address to ALP National Conference, 1967 Every generation has to fight over and over again the battle for our fundamental rights and liberties and this generation has to do that also. We Australians tend to think that our civil rights are beyond question. In recent times, almost every one of…

    December 26, 2010
  • Review of Evidence of the Efficacy of Helmets for Cyclists

    Introduction That the wearing of a helmet can protect cyclists from head injury might seem obvious. Measurements in laboratories have shown that helmets have the potential to do this, but, as Davis (1993) noted, the issue is what happens when the devices promoted by such research are used and adapted by real people. Research into…

    December 26, 2010
  • Discouragement Of Cycling, And Effects On Welfare

    Written in 1994 1. Introduction This paper examines the rationale for compulsory wearing of helmets as stated by the then Federal Minister for Land Transport: that head injury to cyclists will be reduced, resulting in savings to the community in health care and other costs – in effect, an increase in public welfare. Laboratory tests…

    December 26, 2010
  • A Review of the South Australian Office of Road Safety Report 8/94

    1. Introduction This is a review of the South Australian Office of Road Safety report 8/94 subtitled “Evaluation of the Compulsory Helmet Wearing Legislation for Bicyclists in South Australia”. This report (herein referred to as SAORS 8/94) shows that authorities in South Australia have been committed to the policy of helmet wearing for cyclists since…

    December 26, 2010
←Previous Page
1 … 6 7 8 9
Next Page→
Brief history of helmet law in Australia
History of helmet law in AustraliaHistory of helmet law in Australia
Fighting a helmet fine in the Victorian courts

CRAG

Proudly powered by WordPress